Verbal Self Defense Tactics

When Internet Vigilantes Become Cyber-Bullies

July 22nd, 2010

It’s a basic component of human nature to be curious — one of the Prime Directives of the Unconscious Mind is to always be seeking new knowledge and always learning new information. In our modern society this deeper need for more information and understanding has lead to a strong demand from the public for government and organizations to be more open about procedures and policies with regard to what they do, how they do it, and why.

One unexpected benefit of this general drive toward organizational transparency has, in the last few decades, brought about discoveries of dishonest and underhanded actions on the part of officials in all levels of public and private office. The downside of these new insights is an overall sense of distrust and fear among the average people in our communities.

USEFUL VIGILANTISM

Now, when this natural sense of curiosity is combined with our need for fairness and equality the outcome can be both gainful and disastrous. In the case of our political, legal, union, government, and organizational systems the result has been overwhelmingly positive with greater accountability on the part of people in positions of power. As well, it has allowed for more and more input from the public at large in how things are done and where our society, both nationally and internationally, is headed. Positive results due to internet vigilantes include:

YouTube Cat Abuse Incident
A video of a young male physically abusing a cat was posted on YouTube. After 30,000 views, YouTube removed the video and blocked the hosting account. Anonymous members investigated, identifying the individual as Kenny Glenn of Lawton, Oklahoma and reported him to local law enforcement. Two minors were arrested on charges of cruelty to animals.
Cyclist Abuser Incident
In 2008, video of Patrick Pogan, a rookie police officer, body-slamming Christopher Long, a free-spirited cyclist, surfaced on the Internet. The altercation happened when members of Critical Mass conducted a bicycling advocacy event at Times Square. The officer claimed the cyclist had veered into him, and so the biker was charged with assault, disorderly conduct and resisting arrest. The video went viral on the internet and after being viewed for over 2 million times. The charges against the cyclist were later dropped and Pogan was found to be guilty and was convicted for lying about confrontation with cyclist.

HARMFUL VIGILANTISM

On the flip-side there has also been an ever increasing sense of injustice on the part of individuals. To quote an old saying, ‘You can please some of the people most of the time, but you’ll never please everyone all of the time.’ — and, in this regard, that saying is truer than ever. Where there was a time when a consensus was needed for any type of action to be taken people have become more self-focused in their beliefs and values, resulting in a deeper feeling of ‘I’m right and you’re wrong’ in some people. If this need to be ‘right’ is transferred onto situations of injustice or inequality people begin to feel a strong desire for vengeance or ‘payback’ in order to balance things out — to quote another old saying, ‘What goes around comes around’ … the problem being that people who feel they’re right want to be the person to enforce the ‘comes around’ part.

In the past it took an effort on the part of many people to organize and protest and take action to make changes and influence people in power. As the world has grown smaller and smaller with the advancement of new communication technologies, the number of people, the time required and the target of such protest and action have gotten smaller as well. Today, this modern vigilante mentality has moved to the internet in many different forms of cyber-bullying. Some notable examples from the Wikipedia article on Internet Vigilantism include:

Dog Shit Girl
In 2005 in South Korea, bloggers targeted a woman who refused to clean up when her dog defecated on the floor of a Seoul subway car, labeling her “dog shit girl” (rough translation into English). Another commuter had taken a photograph of the woman and her dog, and posted it on a popular Korean website. Within days, she had been identified by internet vigilantes, and much of her personal information was exposed on the World Wide Web in an attempt to punish her for the offense. The story received mainstream attention when it was widely reported in South Korean media, and was discussed in Korean communities in the United States as well. The public humiliation led the woman to quit her university, according to reports.

The reaction by Korean citizens to the incident prompted several Korean newspapers to run editorials voicing concern over Internet vigilantism. One paper quoted Daniel Solove as saying that the woman was the victim of a “cyber-posse, tracking down norm violators and branding them with digital Scarlet Letters.” Another called it an “Internet witch-hunt,” and went on to say that “the Internet is turning the whole society into a kangaroo court.”
Zhang Ya & Sichuan Earthquake
In 2008, a girl called Zhang Ya (sp?) from Liaoning province, Northeast China, posted a 4 minute video of herself complaining about the amount of attention the Sichuan earthquake victims were receiving on television. An intense response from Internet vigilantes resulted in the girl’s personal details (even including her blood type) being made available online, as well as dozens of abusive video responses on Chinese websites and blogs. The girl was taken into police custody for three days as protection from vigilante death threats.
Stephen Fowler and Wife Swap
Stephen Fowler, an English expatriate and venture capitalist businessman, gained notoriety after his performance on ABC’s Wife Swap (originally aired Friday January 30, 2009) when his wife exchanged positions in his family with a woman from Missouri for a two-week period. In response to her rule changes (standard procedure for the second week in the show) he insulted his guest and, in doing so, groups including the lower classes, soldiers, and the overweight. Several websites were made in protest against his behaviour, such as StephenFowlerSucks.com. After the show, and after watching the Wife Swap video, his wife, a professional life coach, reported that she had encouraged him to attend professional behaviour counselling. Businesses with only tangential connection to Fowler publicly disclaimed any association with him due to the negative publicity. He resigned positions on the boards of two environmental charities to avoid attracting negative press.
Vigilante Group Torments Mother
In 2009, a Facebook group was started, accusing a single mother for the death of a 13 month old child in her foster care. It was the Mother’s, then-common-law husband who pleaded guilty to manslaughter and the mother was not accused of any wrongdoing. It’s important to note that none of the vigilantes were held accountable for the consequences of any damages caused by the original accusations made against the innocent woman.

VIGILANTE DANGERS

Although a person’s heart is often in the right place the thing people should keep in mind is that no one ever fully knows all the information on a situation. This is the reason why there are procedures and protocols for investigators in law enforcement, government agencies, and organizations — to ensure there is a full and clear understanding of all the facts BEFORE any action is taken against a person or group.

Individual vigilantes who work within the system to initiate and encourage proper investigations by qualified people can definitely make a positive difference in our world … however, individual bullies and cyber-bullies who seek only to advance their own self-proclaimed heroism by enforcing their own twisted form of justice will only do more harm than good — creating a society where it is an accepted common practice to take action specifically designed to hurt others (even with the best of intentions) will only increase the feelings of anger, hate, resentment, and distrust which are already too prevalent in our world.

The final outcome to these kinds of attacks (especially from sources which aren’t held accountable for unfounded or unethical accusations — i.e. anonymous cyber-bullies) is being identified more and more often as the cause for bullycide in our communities. To better understand how cyber vigilantes incite people to commit bullycide you can check out the article recently published on www.DrDanSays.com ‘Why did daddy kill himself?‘